Consultation and Vote
Will members have a say? Will members have a vote?
When is the vote?
Is there a minimum number of votes that need to be cast for this upcoming vote?
Does this model only work if all four provinces agree to it?
No. This model would work best if all four provinces collaborated, but it could still go ahead if only two provinces, for example, implemented it.
MRTs in a province that did not implement the CAMRT-Atlantic model would still have access to a regular CAMRT membership, but would not receive the benefit of additional provincial advocacy, programs and services from the $50 CAMRT-ATL membership.
Regulation & Representation
Where did this idea come from?
Regulatory bodies are either in place or nearing their final stages of development in the four Atlantic provinces. The primary mandate of these regulatory bodies is to ensure public safety.
In the case of Nova Scotia and New Brunswick, the regulatory bodies (which are evolving, but exist already) are able to offer only limited provincial association services, and only when the activities directly fulfill their mandate of public protection. With the restrictions placed on regulatory bodies, there are often significant gaps in the protection and support of the MRT profession, and the ability to speak up for MRTs. Evolving legislation will only further restrict the ability to provide association services to members, leaving regulatory bodies unable to provide association services to MRTs, and the MRTs themselves without a provincial voice acting on their behalf.
In the case of Prince Edward Island and Newfoundland & Labrador , new regulatory bodies, separate to the current provincial associations, have been or will be established to fulfill the regulatory function. Although there would be nothing to formally preclude the continuation of PEIAMRT and NLAMRT as provincial associations, both organizations would expect to face significant challenges in recruiting volunteers to keep up operations, particularly with the competing volunteer demands from the college itself. In addition, the financial implications for members — of paying dues to three separate organizations — begged the question as to whether there could be a better model for provincial association services and representation .
The leaders from all the Atlantic Associations, or AMRTA (Atlantic MRT Accord), expressed their desire to see these provincial association services such as advocacy, events, education, awards, and regional communications continue for their members. After seeing how MRTs in British Columbia benefited from their new Association model, where the CAMRT layered in additional staffing and resources to provide provincial association services, while benefitting from efficiencies and economies of scale, AMRTA approached CAMRT to explore the possibility of a model for Atlantic Canada.
At no time has the importance of provincial representation been more important than now. If these bodies are unable to advocate on your behalf for vaccine access, and appropriate PPE, or to provide programs and services to support your mental wellness, then who will?
Why have you chosen to consult the membership on the future of provincial association services at this time?
Where the MRT profession is already regulated, we know that government regulations defining the mandate of the regulatory bodies are tightening to restrict and eliminate the provision of any “association” type services that are not in the direct interest of public protection. With other regulatory colleges on the horizon, the resulting gap in representation, support and advocacy has reached a crucial tipping point.
In anticipation of these gaps, the senior leadership of AMRTA contacted the CAMRT as they already offer so many of the same services. It was only within the last 12 months that a detailed plan was developed, with budget estimates surrounding CAMRT delivery of provincial services. That is why we have initiated a consultation at this stage of the project, so we can hear what you want and need, and move ahead with the membership behind us. In a decision of this magnitude, we need membership involvement and to hear our member’s opinions.
How am I represented at the provincial level currently?
In PEI and Newfoundland & Labrador, the PEIAMRT and NLAMRT support, advocate for, and provide valuable programs and services to members. They provide continuing education and networking opportunities to members to ensure they maintain accepted standards of practice and patient safety. They also serve as the voice of members to the public, governments, and other stakeholders in the province to promote the value of qualified medical imaging and radiation therapy professionals and support the advancement of the profession.
In Nova Scotia and New Brunswick, the NSCMIRTP and NBAMRT are both regulatory bodies with a mandate to protect the public. In the past, both organizations have also delivered a variety of “association” services as well. However, in both provinces, government regulations defining the mandate of the regulatory bodies are tightening to restrict and eliminate the provision of any “association” type services that are not in the direct interest of public protection.
What is the current relationship between the CAMRT and the provincial association (PEIAMRT or NLAMRT)? What are the differences?
What is the current relationship between the CAMRT and the provincial regulatory body (NBAMRT and NSCMIRTP)? What are the differences?
Once we are regulated, will the PEIAMRT or NLAMRT become our College?
No, new regulatory colleges will be established. The provinces of PEI and Newfoundland & Labrador will not entertain the idea of a hybrid college/association; each must be separate organizations, carrying out different mandates.
In both provinces, the college’s mandate is to protect the public, while the mandate of the CAMRT and provincial associations (PEIAMRT, NLAMRT) is to serve MRTs and work for the advancement of the profession.
Couldn’t regulatory colleges carry out association services as in some other provinces?
Services & Value
What are the advantages of tasking CAMRT with the delivery of provincial services?
The greatest advantage is having a paid Provincial Manager for your province, who will be dedicated to the delivery of advocacy, programs and services in each province in the region. Members will benefit from Atlantic Canada focused advocacy, relevant webinar topics, regional education and marketing initiatives and the continuation of the biannual AMRTA Conferences. Members will also benefit from a dedicated Site Ambassador program, the continuation of regional/provincial awards and additional support for MRT Week.
The Provincial Manager will be connected to members through the creation of an “Atlantic Advisory Council” to support regional initiatives and to advise on trending local issues. Atlantic MRTs will gain a much larger, collective voice at the stakeholder tables and will benefit from the CAMRT infrastructure already in place, and the 20 paid staff already working for us at the National level.
The CAMRT-ATL model helps to maximize efficiency and eliminate duplicate services and functions between organizations. Rather than spending time on governance office administration, membership registration, education for members and communications, volunteers can shift their efforts to the priorities they are truly passionate about: advancing and advocating for the profession at the provincial level and engaging members in the delivery of value for the dues.
An Atlantic Facebook page will also be initiated, as well as a full section on the CAMRT website.
What is a Site Ambassador Program?
If there is no provincial association, will members lose the opportunity to give back and develop in leadership positions?
Cost
What will it cost?
Dues for the proposed CAMRT-Atlantic would be an additional $50 to the current $225 CAMRT membership dues. CAMRT + CAMRT-ATL together would cost $275 annually. Dues can be paid in monthly installments, and in some health authorities, through payroll deduction.
The dues above do not include the registration fees administered by the regulatory college in each province.
Where will this extra money go?
What will the process be for increasing dues, if required, under the CAMRT delivery of provincial service model?
Can a member choose to join only the national component of CAMRT? Only the provincial component (CAMRT-ATL)?
Dissolution
What will happen to the NLAMRT and PEIAMRT if we choose to pursue the CAMRT-ATL model?
Advisory Council
What will the role of the CAMRT-ATL advisory council be?
How will members of the CAMRT-ATL advisory council be selected?
How can someone from CAMRT know enough of what is happening in the Atlantic provinces?
The primary purpose of the CAMRT-ATL advisory council will be to act as the “eyes and ears” of the CAMRT in the Atlantic Provinces – to relay all that it hears from members and to weigh matters of provincial importance in its advice.
In addition, the new Provincial Manager role for CAMRT-ATL will be created to oversee and manage Atlantic provincial services. This employee will spend the majority of their time dealing specifically with issues that relate to the provinces in Atlantic Canada. The employee will liaise frequently with the Atlantic Advisory Council and the council with the employee to ensure local information is passed on. This employee will be an MRT, based on the ground in one of the Atlantic provinces. Our site ambassador program and the advisory council will greatly assist in the communication flow back and forth with the CAMRT.
What will happen to the Atlantic reps that are currently part of the CAMRT Board?
Who will represent us at other National tables?
Other Questions
Would CAMRT-ATL have an annual AGM?
What about the financial reports?
What is the CAMRT-BC Model?
What happens if we adopt CAMRT-ATL and it doesn’t work out?
If the membership is dissatisfied with this model, they would always be able to move a motion at the CAMRT AGM to reconsider/re-vote on the model within their province.
If this model is adopted in PEI and Newfoundland & Labrador it will trigger the dissolution of the NLAMRT and the PEIAMRT. In Nova Scotia and New Brunswick, the regulatory colleges will shift to providing little to no association services that aren’t in support of their mandate to protect the public.